NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Ta v R [2009] NSWCCA 196
HEARING DATE(S): 24 July 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 24 July 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1, 38, 52; Hulme J at 39; Johnson J at 2,
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 24 July 2009
DECISION: Application for leave to appeal against sentences is refused.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - robbery whilst armed with dangerous weapon - two robberies and one attempted robbery - planned and co-ordinated offences committed at three separate hotels over short period - whether part of same criminal enterprise - whether error in accumulation of sentences - whether sentences manifestly excessive - whether leave to appeal against sentences ought be granted - leave refused
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Nguyen v R [2007] NSWCCA 14 R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115 CASES CITED : R v Fadi Jajou [2009] NSWCCA 167 Clarke v R [2009] NSWCCA 49 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1987-1988) 164 CLR 465
PARTIES: Ahn Tuan Ta (Applicant) Regina (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/13849
COUNSEL: Ms C Nash (Applicant) Ms M Cinque (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Ford Criminal Lawyers (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 07/11/0704
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: CJ Armitage DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 15 August 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate