NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Hamieh [2010] NSWCCA 189
HEARING DATE(S): 5 July 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 25 August 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Kirby J at 1; Johnson J at 1
DECISION: 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Quash the sentence imposed by the sentencing judge and in lieu thereof order the respondent is sentenced to a term of imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 2 years commencing on 14 May 2010 and concluding on 13 May 2012 with a balance of term of 12 months commencing on 14 May 2012 and concluding on 13 May 2013.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – car rebirthing – Crimes Act 1900, s 154G - CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – objective seriousness of offence – scale of objective seriousness – obligation to state where on the scale of objective seriousness an offence lies - CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – periodic detention – need for general deterrence - CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – manifestly inadequate sentence – whether an order for periodic detention fulfils purposes of punishment - CRIMINAL LAW – plea of guilty – Regina v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131 (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 – common law requirement to state reasons for departing from the standard non-parole period
Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Amendment (Organised Car and Boat Theft) Act 2006 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Firearms Act 1996
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Curtis v R [2007] NSWCCA 11 Douar v Regina [2005] NSWCCA 455; 159 A Crim R 154 El-Chammas v R [2009] NSWCCA 154 Ibbs v R [1987] HCA 46; (1987) 163 CLR 447 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Mason v R [2007] NSWCCA 32 Musgrove v R [2007] NSWCCA 21; (2007) 167 A Crim R 424 Nekuda v R (1989) 39 A Crim R 5 Oh Hyunwook v R [2010] NSWCCA 148 R v AEM; R v KEM; R v MM [2002] NSWCCA 58 R v Bottin [2005] NSWCCA 254 R v Burnett (1996) 85 A Crim R 76 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 at 354 R v Duffy [1999] NSWCCA 321 R v Foster [2001] NSWCCA 215 R v Hallocoglu (1992) 29 NSWLR 67 R v Harrison (1997) 93 A Crim R 314 R v Hersi [2010] NSWCCA 57 R v JCE [2000] NSWCCA 498 R v Jenkins [2006] NSWCCA 412 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49 CASES CITED : R v Knight; R v Biuvanua [2007] NSWCCA 283; (2007) 176 A Crim R 338 R v Markarian [2003] NSWCCA 8 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; 66 NSWLR 566 R v Mills [2005] NSWCCA 175; 154 A Crim R 40 R v Mouzomenos [2005] NSWCCA 203 R v Najem [2008] NSWCCA 32 R v Pangallo (1991) 56 A Crim R 441 R v Peel [1971] 1 NSWLR 247 R v Radich (1954) NZLR 86 R v Riddell [2009] NSWCCA 96; 194 A Crim R 524 R v Rushby (1977) 1 NSWLR 594 R v Thomson and Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 R v Tory & Tory [2006] NSWCCA 18 R v Wong; R v Leung [1999] NSWCCA 420; 48 NSWLR 340 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Regina v Rivkin [2004] NSWCCA 7; 59 NSWLR 284 Regina v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Rose (New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, 23 May 1996, unreported) Sullivan v R; Skillin v R [2008] NSWCCA 269; 51 MVR 572 Thalari v R [2009] NSWCCA 170 Thomas v R [2006] NSWCCA 313 Veen v R (No 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate