NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: ISPT Pty Ltd v Valuer General [2009] NSWCA 31
HEARING DATE(S): 12 December 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 March 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at 1; Giles JA at 6; Campbell JA at 72
DECISION: Appeals dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: Valuation of land - appeal against decision on a question of law - whether error in regard to comparable sales - finding sales not comparable did not involve question of law - whether "retail demographic evidence" wrongly rejected - sale found comparable subject to same demographic influences - no error in rejection - whether error in adjustment of comparable sale by not deducting "value of leases" - deduction of value of income stream from leases - or deduction of value of lease income for a letting-up period - former not required, latter did not involve a question of law.
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 57(1)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
AMP Henderson Global Investors v Valuer General [2004] NSWCA 264; (2004) 134 LGERA 426; B & L Linings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2008] NSWCA 187; Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Gold Estates of Australia (1903) Ltd (1934) 51 CLR 509; Goode v Valuer-General (1979) 22 SASR 247; Hope v Bathurst City Council (1980) 144 CLR 1; Housing Commission of New South Wales v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd (1983) 3 NSWLR 378; Leichhardt Municipal Council v Seatainer Terminals Ltd (1981) LGRA 409; Maurici v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2003] HCA 8; (2003) 212 CLR 111; CASES CITED: Melwood Units Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Main Roads (1979) AC 426; Mir Bros Unit Constructions Pty Ltd v Roads & Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWCA 314; Roads and Traffic Authority v Mosca [2006] NSWCA 159; (2006) 146 LGERA 335; Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales v Peak [2007] NSWCA 66; Royal Sydney Golf Club v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1957) 97 CLR 379; Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs v Charlesworth Pilling & Co [1901] AC 373; Spencer v The Commonwealth (1907) 5 CLR 418; Tooheys, Ltd v The Valuer-General (1925) AC 439; Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd (in liq) v Darling Harbour Authority (1991) 24 NSWLR 156; (2006) LGERA 335;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate