NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Bell v R; Jelisavac v R [2009] NSWCCA 206
HEARING DATE(S): 10 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 19 August 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at 1; Price J at 2; Harrison J at 108
DECISION: Bell: 1.Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Jelisavac: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - sentencing - parity - different charging of offenders - medical condition - special circumstances not found - finding of no real prospects of rehabilitation - repeat offender - leniency extended previously - serious offences committed whilst on parole - starting point of sentence.
Crimes Act 1900 s 33B, s 33B(2), s 97(2), LEGISLATION CITED: s 112(2), Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 44(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6(3)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 Callaghan v The Queen (2006) 160 A Crim R 145 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Formosa [2005] NSWCCA 363 CASES CITED : R v Gill [2002] NSWCCA 93 R v Hammoud (2000) 118 A Crim R 66 R v Kerr [2003] NSWCCA 234 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Miranda (2002) 128 A Crim R 362 R v So [2004] NSWCCA 362 The Queen v Hoar (1981) 148 CLR 32 Trindall v The Queen (2006) 171 A Crim R 87
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate