NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hollingsworth v Thompson [2010] NSWSC 1033
HEARING DATE(S) : 6 and 9 September 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 24 September 2010
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton AJ
DECISION : Defendant to have 62.5% of the value of the Bondi Junction property.
CATCHWORDS : FAMILY LAW AND CHILD WELFARE [105] - De facto relationships - Legislation - New South Wales - Property (Relationships) Act 1984 - Adjustment of property interests - Discretion - Principles on which exercised
LEGISLATION CITED : Property (Relationships) Act 1984
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Bilous v Mudalian (2006) 65 NSWLR 615 Chanter v Catts (2005) 64 NSWLR 360 Davey v Lee (1990) 13 Fam LR 688 CASES CITED : Evans v Marmont (1997) 42 NSWLR 70 Howlett v Neilson (2006) 33 Fam LR 402 Jones v Grech (2001) 27 Fam LR 711 Kardos v. Sarbutt) (2006) 24 Fam LR 550 Parker v Parker (1993) 16 Fam LR 863
Allan Francis Hollingsworth (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Peta Maree Thompson (First Defendant) L & L Luxor Pty Limited (Second Deendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 277274 of 2008
D Dura (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : CM Simpson SC (First Defendant) No appearance (Second Defendant)
Doyle Edwards Anderson Lawyers (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Christopher Hughes & Associates (First Defendant) No appearance (Second Deendant)
- 11 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
HAMILTON AJ
FRIDAY 24 SEPTEMBER 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate