NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 74 NSWLR 612
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : AMI Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 863 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 24 August 2009 JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Rein J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 25 August 2009
1. Leave granted to vary the interlocutory injunction in the terms sought. DECISION : 2. The plaintiffs to pay the first, third and fourth defendants' costs of the Motion. 3. Order 1 above is not to take effect until 4pm today.
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY – equitable remedies – injunctions – application to vary of interlocutory injunction to permit publication of report of hearing before Commonwealth Parliamentary Standing Committee - EVIDENCE – admissibility and relevancy – objection to affidavit evidence based on contention that by virtue of s 16(3) Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 (Cth) it was not lawful for such evidence to be tendered or received – evidence which is relied on to prove that something was said in Parliamentary proceedings does not infringe s 16(3) of the Act
LEGISLATION CITED : Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 (Cth)
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock (2007) 232 CLR 245 Comalco Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [1983] 50 ACTR 1 CASES CITED : Habib v Commonwealth of Australia [2008] FCA 1494 Mundey v Askin [1982] 2 NSWLR 369 R v Theophanous [2003] VSCA 78
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate