NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: HANCOCK v ARNOLD; DODD v ARNOLD (NO. 2) [2009] NSWCA 19
HEARING DATE(S): On written submissions
JUDGMENT DATE: 20 February 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Ipp JA at 1; McColl JA at 1; Basten JA at 1
(1) Motion dismissed. DECISION: (2) The barrister to pay the solicitors' costs of the motion.
CATCHWORDS: COSTS – offers of compromise – indemnity costs – whether letters contained offers of compromise – invitation to abandon cross-claim – offer to accept judgment on cross-claim without costs order – invitation to enter into release and indemnity – time allowed for acceptance - COSTS – scope of leave given to challenge costs orders - PROCEDURE – entry of judgment – procedure for variation of orders – oral application – power of Court to vary orders after entry – whether order determining claim for relief includes ancillary or consequential relief – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.11, 36.16
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 14 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.11, 36.16
CATEGORY: Consequential orders
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Meredith (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 133 Hancock v Arnold; Dodd v Arnold [2008] NSWCA 254 Herning v GWS Machinery Pty Ltd [No. 2] [2005] NSWCA 375 CASES CITED: Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 85 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341 Sunlec International Ltd v Carroll Australasia Pty Ltd [2001] WASC 354 Townsend v Townsend (No 2) [2001] NSWCA 145
In matter No. CA 40619/07: Ken Hancock – First Appellant John Hill – Second Appellant Jason Arnold – First Respondent PARTIES: John William Dodd – Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate