NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: O'SULLIVAN v MEDICAL TRIBUNAL OF NEW SOUTH WALES [2009] NSWCA 374 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 24 September 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 20 November 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Tobias JA at 1; Basten JA at 1
DECISION: (1) Dismiss the summons. (2) Order that the applicant pay the costs of the Health Care Complaints Commission in this Court.
CATCHWORDS: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – intervention in ongoing inquiry – availability of relief against refusal to recuse – order in the nature of prohibition - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – procedural fairness – bias – Medical Tribunal – prejudicial documents agreed to be excluded from tender but inadvertently provided to one Tribunal member – documents identified and looked at by Tribunal members before resolving that documents would not be taken into account – whether Tribunal members should have recused themselves due to reasonable apprehension of bias - LEGAL PRACTITIONERS – medical practitioners – Medical Tribunal – constitution, functions and procedures – relevance to reasonable apprehension of bias
LEGISLATION CITED: Medical Practice Act 1992 (NSW), ss 36, 37, 90, 147, 148, 151, 154, 161, 189; Sch 2, cll 1, 5, 6
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission [1992] HCA 10; 175 CLR 564 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337 Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81; 159 CLR 550 CASES CITED: Lee v Cha [2008] NSWCA 13 Pioneer Shipping Ltd v BTP Tioxide Ltd [1982] AC 724 The Queen v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong [1976] HCA 39; 136 CLR 248 Smith v NSW Bar Association [1992] HCA 36; 176 CLR 256 Webb v The Queen [1994] HCA 30; 181 CLR 41
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate