NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: GORDON v R [2009] NSWCCA 72
HEARING DATE(S): 9 March 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 25 March 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; Blanch J at 2; Price J at 39
DECISION: Appeal against conviction dismissed. Appeal against sentence dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - particular offences - offences relating to administration of justice - interference with witnesses or jurors
Crimes Act 1900 s 322(a), s 323(a) LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995, s 76, s 76(1), s 50(3), s 77 Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 6(1)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 Hargan v The Queen (1919) 27 CLR 13 CASES CITED : Ratten v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510 Whitehorn v The Queen (1983) 152 CLR 657 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300
PARTIES: Daniel Tasman GORDON (Appellant) Regina (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/11776
COUNSEL: N Carroll (Appellant) V Lydiard (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: George Sten & Co (Appellant) S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/21/3277
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Armitage ADCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 6 September 2007
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: Regina v Daniel Tasman GORDON
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
CCA 2005/11776
GROVE J BLANCH J PRICE J
25 March, 2009
Daniel Tasman GORDON v Regina
JUDGMENT
1 GROVE J: I agree with Blanch J.
2 BLANCH J: The appellant stood trial in the District Court in Sydney from 4 September, 2007 to 6 September, 2007 on an indictment containing the following count: Count 1: Threaten to cause injury or detriment to person with intent to influence witness to give false evidence or withhold true evidence or not to attend as a witness on 27 February, 2007.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate