NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 203 A Crim R 398
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R (Cth) v Cheung; R (Cth) v Choi [2010] NSWCCA 244
HEARING DATE(S): 31 March 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 28 October 2010
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; Simpson J at 2; Buddin J at 154
DECISION: Crown appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – Commonwealth Criminal Code – particular offences – drug offences – manufacturing commercial quantity of controlled drug (methamphetamine) – CRIMINAL LAW – Crown appeal against manifest inadequacy of sentence – objective gravity of offences – CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – sentencing procedure – sentencing statistics – applicable range of sentences – consideration of comparable offences – comparable sentences under Commonwealth law – comparable sentences under state law – appropriate basis for comparison – CRIMINAL LAW – enactment of s 68A Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 – construction of s 68A – partial resolution by publication of R v JW – whether s 68A applies to Crown appeals – preclusion from taking into account double jeopardy element: R v De La Rosa – discretion to reject Crown appeal – Crown appeal dismissed
Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Customs Act 1901 (Cth) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
El-Ghourani v R [2009] NSWCCA 140; (2009) 195 A Crim R 208 Maldonado v R [2009] NSWCCA 189 R v Anderson [2004] NSWCCA 317 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Cameron [2002] HCA 6; (2002) 209 CLR 339 R v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 208 R v El-Azzi [2004] NSWCCA 455 R v Fahda [1999] NSWCCA 267 R v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49 R v Kevenaar [2004] NSWCCA 210; (2004) 148 A Crim R 155 R v Laurentiu (1992) 63 A Crim R 402 R v Lee [2007] NSWCCA 234 R v Lo (District Court of New South Wales, 16 June 2006, unreported) CASES CITED : R v Mascaro-Varillas [2002] NSWCCA 524 R v Millerat [2005] NSWCCA 142 R v Otto [2005] NSWCCA 333; (2005) 157 A Crim R 525 R v Pedavoli [2002] NSWCCA 87; (2002) 128 A Crim R 137 R v Riddell [2009] NSWCCA 96; (2009) 194 A Crim R 524 R v Rivadavia; R v El Akkaoui; R v Aksu [2004] NSWCCA 284; (2004) 61 NSWLR 63 R v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135 R v Studenikin [2004] NSWCCA 164; (2004) 60 NSWLR 1 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v To [2007] NSWCCA 200; (2007) 172 A Crim R 121 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42; (2002) 71 NSWLR 692 R v Wong; R v Leung [1999] NSWCCA 420; (1999) 48 NSWLR 340 Song Lin v R [2007] NSWCCA 368 Tyler v R; R v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247; (2007) 173 A Crim R 458 TYN v R [2009] NSWCCA 146; (2009) 195 A Crim R 345 Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate