NSW Caselaw
Appeal Outcome: Special leave dismissed by the High Court, 31 March 2010 s301/2009 & s301/2009 [2010] HCASL 61
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: SATCHITHANANTHAM v KING MORTGAGES; CASH KING Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 358 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 12/10/2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 12 October 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Tobias JA at 1 & 15; Campbell JA at 2 & 20; Handley AJA at 2
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 12 October 2009
DECISION: Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution and no order as to costs.
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL - dismissed for want of prosecution - no question of principle.
LEGISLATION CITED: Corporations Act, s 500(2)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Hemalathasomhy Ranjini Satchithanantham - First Appellant PARTIES: Thambiapph Satchithanantham - Second Appellant King Mortgages Pty Ltd - Respondent Cash King Pty Ltd - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40034/07, 40035/07, 40036/07 & 40037/07
COUNSEL: Mr Sachi for the First and Second Appellants No appearance for Respondents
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Common Law Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 13736 and 12756 of 2004
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Bell J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 08/12/2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 040037/07 040034/07 040035/07 040036/07
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate