NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Steffen v ANZ Banking Group [2009] NSWSC 883
HEARING DATE(S) : 12 August 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 31 August 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : McDougall J at 1
DECISION : See paragraph [45] of the judgment.
CATCHWORDS : COSTS – application for preliminary discovery – whether proceedings properly characterised as adversarial – whether an 'event' – whether any costs order should be immediate or contingent.
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 LEGISLATION CITED : Federal Court Rules Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CATEGORY : Consequential orders
Airways Corp of New Zealand v Koenig [2002] NSWSC 521 Bio Transplant Inc v Bell Porter Securities Ltd [2008] NSWSC 694 Cappuccio v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [1999] FCA 1188 C7 Pty Ltd v Foxtel Management Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1864 CASES CITED : Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1AC 280 Hornsby Shire Council v Valuer General of NSW [2008] NSWSC 1281 Newcrest Mining Limited v Apache Northwest Pty Ltd (No2) [2008] FCA 1663 Panasonic Australia Pty Ltd v Ngage Pty Ltd (No2) [2006] NSWSC 399 SmithKline Beecham plc v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 271 Totalise plc v Motley Fool Ltd [2003] 2 All ER 872
PARTIES : Joachim Kurt Steffen (Plaintiff) Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50245/08
COUNSEL : D R Pritchard SC / J S Emmett (Plaintiff) J T G Gibson (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate