NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: WU v R [2010] NSWCCA 286
HEARING DATE(S): 11 August 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 7 December 2010
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; Hulme J at 2; Davies J at 51
(i) Grant leave to appeal; (ii) Allow the appeal; (iii) Confirm the sentence imposed by Williams DCJ on the charge of, on 21 December 2007, supplying a commercial quantity of 4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine; DECISION: (iv) Quash the sentences imposed on counts (ii) and (iii); (v) In respect of the offence of, on 21 December 2007, supplying a large commercial quantity of 4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine, sentence the Applicant to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 5 years commencing on 21 December 2008 and a further term of 4 years commencing on 21 December 2013; (vi) In respect of the offence of, between 13 November and 21 December 2007, supplying a large commercial quantity of 4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine, sentence the Applicant to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 5 years commencing on 21 December 2008 and a further term of 4 years commencing on 21 December 2013; (vii) Record as the date upon which it appears to the Court that the Applicant shall become eligible for parole, 21 December 2013.
PARTIES: Tianhao Roy WU Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2009/5535
COUNSEL: Applicant: D Carroll Respondent: PM Miller
SOLICITORS: Applicant: S O'Connor Respondent: S Kavanagh
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Williams DCJ
- 1 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2009/5535
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate