NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lee v Travers & Ors [2009] NSWSC 398
HEARING DATE(S) : 13 May 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 29 May 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Bryson AJ at 1
DECISION : Dismiss the appeal with costs.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE and PROCEDURE - Summary Disposal UCPR 13.4 - Appeal from dismissal by Associate Judge of proceedings after Amended Statement of Claim filed purportedly under leave granted on earlier Summary Disposal Application - detailed review of alleged errors in exercise of discretion under UCPR 13.4. HELD - no error, appeal dismissed.
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1965 (Cth)
CATEGORY : Consequential orders
Dey v Victorian Railways Commission (1949) 78 CR 62 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner of Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Hillebrand v Council of the City of Penrith (2000) NSWSC 1058 CASES CITED : House v R [1936] HCA 40 Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274 Tresize v National Australia Bank Limited [2005] FCA 1095 Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514
Leonard John Lee (Plaintiff) PARTIES : John Christopher Travers (First Defendant) Gerald Joseph Travers (Second Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5008/07
COUNSEL : Ivan Griscti (Plaintiff) Marcus Pesman (Defendants)
SOLICITORS : Herbert Greer (Plaintiff) Henry Davis York (Defendants)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court (Associate Judge)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate