NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Lazaridis v Humphris-Clark [2010] NSWCA 349
HEARING DATE(S): 6 December 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 6 December 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop ACJ at 1; Handley AJA at 11
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 6 December 2010
DECISION: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL - civil - leave to appeal - whether parties reached binding agreement to settle dispute - deed of release - no sufficient basis that appeal would be successful
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
PARTIES: Ilias Lazaridis (Applicant) Dr Peter Humphris-Clark (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 2009/290665
COUNSEL: Mr B R McClintock (Applicant) Mr B Shields (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Thomas Mitchell Solicitors (Applicant) Guild Lawyers (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2009/290665
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Bergin CJ in Eq
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 27 April 2010
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: Humpris-Clark v Lazaridis [2010] NSWSC 318
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 2009/290665
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate