NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : J P Morgan Australia Limited -v- Consolidated Minerals Limited [2010] NSWSC 100 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 22, 23, 24 February 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 18 March 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Hammerschlag J
DECISION : Subject to the effect of any arthimetical recalculation in accordance with these reasons, the plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. The defendant's cross-claim dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS – construction of commercial contracts – defendant retained plaintiff to advise on takeover defence strategy – engagement provided for payment of different fees depending on the outcome of takeover offers – a number of takeover offers were made by different offerors, one of which resulted in the takeover of the defendant – dispute as to what fees are in the circumstances payable and how they are to be calculated – ACCORD AND SATISFACTION – defence of accord and satisfaction – defendant proffered cheque for an amount less than the plaintiff was claiming under cover of a letter stating that the cheque was "in full and final settlement of the matter" – plaintiff banked cheque and sent letter that it did not accept the payment in full and final settlement – whether the banking of the cheque in the circumstances brought about a binding accord and satisfaction
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165 International Air Transport Association v Ansett Australia Holdings Ltd (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) (2008) 242 ALR 47 McCann v Switzerland Insurance Australia Ltd (2000) 203 CLR 579 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 Franklins Pty Limited v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 407 [19] Wilkie v Gordian Runoff Limited (2005) 221 CLR 522 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australasian Performing Right Association Limited (1973) 129 CLR 99 Chartbrook Limited v Persimmon Homes [2009] 1 AC 1101 Claremont Petroleum NL v Cummings & Anor (1992) 9 ACSR 1 Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 McDermott v Black (1940) 63 CLR 161 CASES CITED : Osborn v McDermott [1998] 3 VR 1 Illawong Village Pty Limited v State Bank of New South Wales [2004] NSWSC 18 FT Jeffrey v Evington Holdings Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (Supreme Court of Victoria, Full Court, 24 November 1977, unreported) Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95 McMahon's (Transport) Pty Ltd v Ebbage [1995] 1 Qd R 185 Empirnall Holdings Pty Limited v Machon Paull Partners Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 523 Day v McLea (1889) LR 22 QBD 610 Bagnall v National Tobacco Corporation of Australia Ltd (1934) 34 SR (NSW) 421 Wiseman v MQH Developments (Supreme Court of Victoria, Chernov J, 19 May 1997, unreported) Wicks v First National Picture (Australasia) Ltd (1931) 31 SR (NSW) 427 Homeguard Products v Kiwi Packaging [1981] 2 NZLR 322 Bond Media Ltd v John Fairfax Group Pty Ltd (1988) 16 NSWLR 82
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate