NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Mobileciti Pty Limited v Vodafone Pty Limited [2009] NSWSC 891
HEARING DATE(S) : 25 and 26 August 2009 JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton AJ
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 26 August 2009
DECISION : Business records rejected under s 135 of the Evidence Act 1995
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE [23] – Admissibility and relevancy – in general – other cases – Judicial discretion to exclude – Evidence Act 1995, s 135
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995, ss 69, 135, 136, 137
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Ainsworth v Burden [2005] NSWCA 174 Dyldam Developments Pty Limited v Jones [2008] NSWCA 56 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2001] NSWSC 222 CASES CITED : Longhurst v Hunt [2004] NSWCA 91 Ordukaya v Hicks [2000] NSWCA 180 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 Roach v Page (No 11) [2003] NSWSC 907 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 8) [2005] FCA 1348
Mobileciti Pty Limited (plaintiff) PARTIES : Vodafone Pty Limited (first defendant) Look Mobile Distribution Pty Limited (second defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 6445/05
Mr M W Young (plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr A S McGrath w. Dr H Bennet (first defendant) No appearance (second defendant)
Dixon Holmes du Pont (plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Henry Davis York (first defendant) No appearance (second defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate