NSW Caselaw
75 NSWLR 427 Reported Decision : 3 ARLR 31 [2010] ALMD 2397
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : PARKINS v LIGHTNING RIDGE MINERS ASSOCIATION LIMITED [2009] NSWSC 621
HEARING DATE(S) : Monday 6 April 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 6 July 2009
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Hall J at 1
DECISION : The further amended summons is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – mining – jurisdiction and powers of Warden's Court to determine provisions of an access management plan for small-scale titles pursuant to Part 10A of the Mining Act 1992 – meaning of "rights of access" in s.236D(1) of the Act – the phrase "in relation to" is to be construed within its statutory context – mullock or waste is an aspect of mining – communal mullock dumps are not an aspect of "rights of access" that may be the subject of an access management plan - STATUTORY INTERPRETATION of "access", "rights of access" – no power to include a provision to require holders of a small-scale title or the defendant association to remove existing communal mullock dumps - PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS – no disadvantage or detriment in breach of procedural fairness in the Warden's Court having used a document - a Management Plan for the property not in evidence - the question of statutory construction not having turned on that document – no breach of procedural fairness in refusing to defer decision pending a possible submission by a Department of Government (a non-party) on availability of financial assistance to enforce access management plans – no breach of procedural fairness in permitting a party to call evidence of an expert nature notwithstanding the failure of the party calling the witness to comply with directions for service of expert reports
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate