NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Australian Building & Technical Solutions Pty Limited v Boumelhem; Boral Australia Limited v Boumelhem; Boumelhem v Jones & Ors [2009] NSWSC 460
HEARING DATE(S) : 7, 8 and 14 May 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 29 May 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Ward J
DECISION : Resulting trust and equitable lien declared in favour of plaintiffs in 4401/08 ranking in priority to equitable charges of plaintiffs in 1648/08 and 4017/08
CATCHWORDS : EQUITY – trusts and trustees – resulting trusts – plaintiffs provided part of purchase price for property in son's name – whether presumption of advancement rebutted – whether presumption of resulting trust rebutted – held that presumption of advancement rebutted – presumption of resulting trust not rebutted – property held on resulting trust for plaintiffs to the extent of their contribution to the purchase price. - EQUITY – trusts and trustees – constructive trusts – whether plaintiffs entitled to relief applying Baumgartner v Baumgartner: whether parties engaged in joint venture - whether joint venture failed without attributable blame - whether unconscionable to deny entitlement of parents – alternatively, whether plaintiffs entitled to relief by reason of proprietary estoppel: whether plaintiffs, in making contributions to property, acted in detrimental reliance upon assumptions induced by legal owner of property – held entitled to relief on both bases - consideration of appropriate relief – whether other relief available – whether constructive trust would grant plaintiffs unfair priority over third party creditors – held appropriate relief provided by declaration of resulting trust in respect of contribution to purchase price and equitable lien securing additional contributions.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate