NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: PANG v BYDAND HOLDINGS Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 175 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 03/06/2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 27 July 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at 1; Macfarlan JA at 2; Handley AJA at 3
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 1 July 2010
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: CONTRACT -- composite instrument -- contract of sale physically incorporating deed of guarantee -- to be construed together. - DEED -- guarantee -- blank -- principal debtor not named -- ascertainable by construction -- deed valid. - INSTRUMENT -- two contracts incorporated in one instrument -- to be construed together.
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Elias v George Sahely & Co [1983] 1 AC 646 Harvey v Edwards Dunlop & Co. Ltd [1927] HCA 13, 39 CLR 302 Hibblewhite v M'Morine (1840) 6 M & W 200 CASES CITED: M'Ewan v Dynon (1877) 3 VLR (L) 271 Stokes v Whicher [1920] 1 Ch 411 Timmins v Moreland Street Property Co. Ltd [1958] Ch 110 CA Toohey v Gunther [1928] HCA 19, 41 CLR 181
PARTIES: A: Vincent Pang R: Bydand Holdings Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 09/298562
COUNSEL: A: D Murr SC and C Lonergan R: B Coles QC and PT Russell
SOLICITORS: A: Maxim Legal Pty Ltd R: Barringer Leather Lawyers
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC 50058/2008
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Hammerschlag J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 10/11/2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate