NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Thomas v Shaw [No 3] [2009] NSWSC 1419
16/2/09 - 20/2/09 30/3/09 26/6/09 HEARING DATE(S) : 24//7/09 30/7/09 16/10/09 20/11/09 24/11/09
JUDGMENT DATE : 18 December 2009
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Kirby J
DECISION : 1. I order that there should be a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in accordance with the amount set out in the judgment of 26 June 2009 (para [314]) as adjusted by this judgment. 2. I have previously ordered that the defendants should pay the plaintiff's costs in accordance with the judgment Thomas v Shaw (No 2) [2009] NSWSC 218, para [8].
CATCHWORDS : CIVIL LAW - NEGLIGENCE - funds management - infant claim - brain damage - incapacity until age 25 years.
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005
CATEGORY : Consequential orders
CASES CITED : Thomas v Shaw [2009] NSWSC 510 Nominal Defendant v Gardikiotis (1995) 186 CLR 49
Cameron Brock Thomas PARTIES : (by his tutor Doreen Thomas) Pl William Richard Shaw (1st Def) Susan Joyce Shaw (2nd Def)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2008/20166
COUNSEL : R Royle (Pl) N Polin (Defs)
SOLICITORS : Slater & Gordon (Pl) Moray & Agnew (Defs)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
KIRBY J
Friday 18 December 2009
2008/20166 Cameron Brock THOMAS (by his tutor Doreen Thomas) v William Richard SHAW and Susan Joyce SHAW
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate