NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: W O v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (NSW) [2009] NSWCA 370
HEARING DATE(S): 20 October 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 16 November 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Fullerton AJA at 1; MCCallum AJA at 1
(1) Grant the applicant leave to rely upon the proposed amended summons as filed and dispense with further requirements of the rules in relation thereto. DECISION: (2) Dismiss the Summons. (3) No order as to the costs of the parties in this Court.
CATCHWORDS: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – prohibition – application in relation to pending criminal proceeding – jurisdictional error – rulings on points of law – concurrent appeal under s 5F of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – no interlocutory judgment or order engaging jurisdiction under s 5F – whether relief in the nature of prohibition available – whether jurisdictional error - WORDS AND PHRASES – "interlocutory judgment or order" – "jurisdictional error"
Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 46, 130 LEGISLATION CITED: District Court Act 1973 (NSW), ss 9, 11, 166 Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), s 179 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 17, 69
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Adler v District Court of New South Wales (1990) 19 NSWLR 317 Barton v Walker [1979] NSWLR 740 Cesan v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2007] NSWCCA 273; 174 A Crim R 385 Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Jiang [2001] FCA 145; 111 FCR 395 CASES CITED: Chow v Director of Public Prosecutions (1992) 28 NSWLR 593 Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58; 184 CLR 163 Fish v Solution 6 Holdings Ltd [2006] HCA 22; 225 CLR 180 Lee v Cha [2008] NSWCA 13 R v Powch (1988) 14 NSWLR 136 Solution 6 Holdings Ltd v Industrial Relations Commission (NSW) [2004] NSWCA 200; 60 NSWLR 558
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate