NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Turco v HP Mercantile Pty Ltd; Marinelli v HP Mercantile Pty Ltd; Turco v HP Mercantile Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 88
HEARING DATE(S): 20 April 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 20 April 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 20 April 2009
DECISION: Orders in accordance with short minutes handed up, as amended, initialled and dated 20 April 2009.
CATCHWORDS: PROCEDURE - application for stay of execution pending appeal - stay to preclude act of bankruptcy - stay refused on respondent's undertaking to consent to adjournment of hearing of creditor's petition.
TEXTS CITED: Shephard v Chiquita Brands (South Pacific) Ltd (2001) FCA 1394.
In proceedings No 40348/08: Mario Turco - Applicant H P Mercantile Pty Ltd - Respondent
In matter No 40349/08: PARTIES: Dominic Marinelli - Applicant HP Mercantile Pty Ltd - Respondent
In matter No 40350/08: Victor Turco - Applicant HP Mercantile Pty Ltd - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40348/08; 40349/08; 40350/08
COUNSEL: M Neil QC & F Salama - Applicants in all matters R Margo SC - Respondent in all matters
SOLICITORS: Galic & Co, Northbridge, WA - Applicants in all matters Versace McKenzie Lawyers - Respondent in all matters
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): DC 5593/02; DC 4413/02; DC 5594/02
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Rolfe DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 28 July 2008
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40348/08 CA 40348/08 CA 40350/08 DC 5593/02 DC 4413/02 DC 5594/02
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate