NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 269 ALR 115240 FLR 27240 FLR 2777 NSWLR 540
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: JIMMY v REGINA [2010] NSWCCA 60
HEARING DATE(S): 17 November 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 April 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Campbell JA at 1; Howie J at 244; Rothman J at 252
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: PROCEDURE - precedents - decisions of particular courts - review of court's previous decisions - effect of Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485 and Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22 in relation to when a court may depart from its own previous decisions - CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCE - relevant factors - the parity principle - the types of people whose sentences can be compared under the parity principle - parity between co-offenders - parity between participants in a criminal enterprise - CRIMINAL LAW - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - appeal against sentence - grounds for interference - the parity principle - CRIMINAL LAW - particular offences - financial transaction offences - money laundering
Australian Constitution Canadian Charter of Rights Crimes Act 1900 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Customs Act 1901 (Cth) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 (Cth) Misuse of Drugs Act 1981 (WA) Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 (Cth) United States Constitution
Alex Mihailovic v The Queen (High Court of Australia, 3 February 1994, noted [1994] 1 Leg Rep page C3) Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia [1989] 1 SCR 143 Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485 Bowtell v The Queen [2004] NSWCCA 17 Commonwealth v Hospital Contribution Fund (1982) 150 CLR 49 CSR Ltd v Eddy [2005] HCA 64; (2005) 226 CLR 1 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 El Hassan v The Queen [2003] NSWCCA 252 Ellis v The Queen (1993) 68 A Crim R 449 Em v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 336 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; (2007) 230 CLR 89 FS v R [2009] NSWCCA 301 Gett v Tabet [2009] NSWCA 76; (2009) 254 ALR 504 HAN, Zhi Qiang v R [2009] NSWCCA 300 Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330 Hudson v The Queen [2009] NSWCCA 59 John v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 166 CLR 417 Jones v The Queen (1993) 67 ALJR 376 Jones, (NSWCCA, 16 April 1992, unreported) Kardoulias v The Queen [2005] NSWCCA 456; (2005) 159 A Crim R 252 Kartinyeri v Commonwealth [1998] HCA 22; 195 CLR 337 Kauwenberghs v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 98; (2008) 186 A Crim R 197 Krakouer v R [1999] WASCA 147; (1999) 107 A Crim R 408 Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46; (1984) 154 CLR 606 Markisic v Commonwealth of Australia [2007] NSWCA 92; (2007) 69 NSWLR 737 Melikian v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 156 Native Title Act Case (1995) 183 CLR 373 OM v The Queen [2009] NSWCCA 267 Osman v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 157 Pham v The Queen [2009] NSWCCA 25 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 Queensland v The Commonwealth (1977) 139 CLR 585 R v AAH & AAG [2009] QCA 321 R v Araya [2005] NSWCCA 283; (2005) 155 A Crim R 555 R v Armstrong [2001] NSWCCA 77 R v Arnold (1993) 30 NSWLR 73 R v Christie [2000] NSWCCA 354 R v Diamond (NSWCCA, 18 February 1993, unreported) CASES CITED : R v F (2002) 132 A Crim R 308 R v Formosa [2005] NSWCCA 363 R v Gibson (1991) 56 A Crim R 1 R v Guzman [2000] NSWCCA 261 R v Holder [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 R v Howard (1992) 29 NSWLR 242 R v Huang; R v Siu [2007] NSWCCA 259; (2007) 174 A Crim R 370 R v Isamunadar [2002] NSWCCA 477; (2002) 136 A Crim R 206 R v Johns [1978] 2 NSWLR 259 R v Johnson [2005] NSWCCA 186 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 R v Kerr [2003] NSWCCA 234 R v Lacey; Ex parte Attorney-General (Qld) [2009] QCA 274 R v Mai (1992) 26 NSWLR 371 R v Nguyen [2005] NSWCCA 362; (2005) 157 A Crim R 80 R v Salameh (NSWCCA, 9 June 1994, unreported) R v Shepherd [2003] NSWCCA 287; (2003) 142 A Crim R 101 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Stanbouli [2003] NSWCCA 355; 141 A Crim R 531 R v Sukkar [2006] NSWCCA 92; (2006) 172 A Crim R 151 R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Tiddy [1969] SASR 575 R v Underwood [2005] VSCA 80 R v Wall [2002] NSWCA 42; (2002) 71 NSWLR 692 Rend v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 41; (2006) 160 A Crim R 178 Rexhaj (NSWCCA, 29 February 1996, unreported) Sharpe v The Queen [2002] NSWCCA 96 Shen v R [2009] NSWCCA 251 Slaughter- House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873) Stanton v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 326 Sumner v R (1985) 19 A Crim R 210 Tatana v R [2006] NSWCCA 398 Thorley (NSWCCA, 5 February 1991, unreported) Tuifua v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 224; (2008) 189 A Crim R 1 United States v Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) Watson v The Queen (NSWCCA, 25 February 1992, unreported) Woodgate v R [2009] NSWCCA 137 Wurramarbra v The Queen (1979) 28 ALR 176; 1 A Crim R 291 Xue v R [2009] NSWCCA 227
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate