NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Pegela Pty Ltd v Oates [2010] NSWCA 186
HEARING DATE(S): 27 April 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 August 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at [1]; McColl JA at [22]; Young JA at [23]
(1) Appeal allowed. DECISION: (2) Judgment of the primary judge set aside. (3) In lieu there be a verdict for the appellants for $91,000 plus interest. (4) The respondents to pay the appellants' costs both here and at first instance, but with respect to the costs of the appeal have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if qualified.
CATCHWORDS: Appeal- Civil- whether leave to appeal required- District Court Act 1973, s 127(2)(c)- whether appeal involves $100,000 or more- realistic prospect of success. Contract- Formation of Contract- variation- relevance of subsequent conduct to formation of contract- agreement between parties to share in costs of litigation- initial discussion that appellants bound to pay 12% of the total costs- whether subsequent communications referring to 1/12th rate varied original agreement- whether subsequent conduct further varied any variation back to 12%- relevance of failure of appellant to give oral evidence regarding further variation- whether primary judge erred in holding respondents had overpaid based on binding 1/12 agreement- whether finding as to original agreement glaringly improbable- implied terms- whether implied term obvious, or necessary for the reasonable or effective operation of the contract- whether implied term that agreement net of GST. Procedure- Civil- whether account stated pleaded- whether case run at trial so as to require its consideration.
LEGISLATION CITED: District Court Act 1973, s 127(2)(c) Supreme Court Act 1970, s 101(2)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate