NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: State of New South Wales v Spearpoint [2009] NSWCA 233
HEARING DATE(S): 30 July 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 30 July 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop ACJ at 19 and 32; Beazley JA at 29; Ipp JA at 1
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 30 July 2009
DECISION: 1. Dismiss the application for leave to appeal. 2. The applicant to pay the respondent the costs not only of the application but of the appeal.
CATCHWORDS: PROCEDURE - miscellaneous procedural matters - application for summary dismissal under UCPR r 13.4(b) - whether pleadings disclose a reasonable cause of action - where defects curable by amendment of pleadings. - TORTS - negligence - duty of care - whether police officers and the police service as a whole owe a duty of care to an individual members of the public - inappropriate to decide at the dismissal stage of proceedings.
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan [2002] HCA 54; (2002) 211 CLR 540 Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1998] AC 53 Mount Isa Mines v Pusey [1970] HCA 60; (1970) 125 CLR 383 CASES CITED: State of NSW v Tyszyk [2008] NSWCA 107 Thompson v Vincent [2005] NSWCA 219 Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62; (2005) 223 CLR 422 Van Colle v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police [2009] 1 AC 225 Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 16; (2004) 216 CLR 515
State of New South Wales (Applicant) PARTIES: Wayne Spearpoint (First Respondent) Toni Maree Spearpoint (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate