NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: PM Sulcs & Associates Pty Ltd v Oliveri [2010] NSWCA 16
HEARING DATE(S): 16 February 2010 JUDGMENT OF: McColl JA at 1; Young JA at 16; Sackville AJA at 17
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 16 February 2010
DECISION: Leave to appeal refused with costs.
CATCHWORDS: LEAVE TO APPEAL – No question of principle
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 CASES CITED: PM Sulcs & Associates Pty Ltd v Daihatsu Australia Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 636 PM Sulcs & Associates Pty Ltd v Oliveri [2009] NSWSC 456 PM Sulcs & Associates Pty Ltd v Oliveri (No 2) [2009] NSWSC 485
PARTIES: PM Sulcs and Associates Pty Ltd (Appellant) Dominic Oliveri (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 2009/00298458
COUNSEL: D E Grieve QC (Appellant) G C Lindsay SC with G P F Rundle (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: O'Neill Partners (Appellant) Penelope Purcell Solicitors (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC 3548/04
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Debelle AJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 2 June 2009
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: [2009] NSWSC 485
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 2009/298458
McCOLL JA YOUNG JA SACKVILLE AJA
16 February 2010 PM SULCS & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD v OLIVERI
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate