NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: DUFFY, Michael John v R; MANGAN, Shane Kenneth v R [2009] NSWCCA 304
HEARING DATE(S): 26 October 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 18 December 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at 1; Fullerton J at 2; McCallum J at 43
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm in company - whether error in factual findings by sentencing judge - whether error in failure to apply 25 per cent discount for guilty plea - whether error in appointment of applicant's role in commission of offence - whether failure to give sufficient weight to subjective circumstances
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
APT v R [2009] NSWCCA 230 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 McKenna v R [2007] NSWCCA 113 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102 CASES CITED : R v Johnstone [2004] NSWCCA 307 R v Mitchell, R v Gallagher [2007] NSWCCA 296; 177 A Crim R 94 R v SY & Anor [2003] NSWCCA 291 R v Scott [2003] NSWCCA 286 Waters v R [2007] NSWCCA 219
Michael John Duffy (App) PARTIES: Shane Kenneth Mangan (App) The Crown (Resp)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2008/2748; 2007/8395
D O'Neil (App Duffy) COUNSEL: D Patch (App Mangan) V Lydiard (Resp)
Legal Aid Commission (App Duffy) SOLICITORS: G Murray (App Mangan) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Resp)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate