NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: BIERMANN v R [2009] NSWCCA 165
HEARING DATE(S): 4 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 19 June 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Campbell JA at 1; Latham J at 2; Harrison J at 34
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted 2. Appeals against sentence dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - supply commercial quantity MDMA and four counts of supply prohibited drug - whether individual sentences and aggregate sentence manifestly excessive - no question of principle.
LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985
Mitchell v R [2008] NSWCCA 192 at [12] R v MacDonnell [2002] NSWCCA 34 R v Hejazi [2003] NSWCCA 383 R v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34 R v Jordan [2002] NSWCCA 228 R v Harmouche 158 A Crim R 357 ; [2005] NSWCCA 398 R v Dang [2005] NSWCCA 430 Stevens v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 252 R v Franklin NSWCCA 11 April 1997 CASES CITED : R v Thompson & Falconer [1999] NSWCCA 50 R v Loh [2002] NSWCCA 23 R v Shi [2004] NSWCCA 135 R v Emanuel [2004] NSWCCA 267 R v Attard [2004] NSWCCA 376 Hutton v R [2008] NSWCCA 99 R v Stankovic [2006] NSWCCA 229 R v Sciberras (2006) 165 A Crim R 532 ; [2006] NSWCCA 268 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 House v The King [1936] HCA 40 ; (1936) 55 CLR 499
PARTIES: Benjamin Luke Biermann - Applicant Regina - Crown respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/15646
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate