NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: HEI HEI, Marcus Joseph v R; R v Marcus Joseph HEI HEI [2009] NSWCCA 87
HEARING DATE(S): 23 March 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 2 April 2009
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; Buddin J at 2; Rothman J at 3
(1) Leave to appeal be granted;
DECISION: (2) The appeal against sentence by Mr Hei Hei be dismissed;
(3) The appeal by the Crown against the order of his Honour Judge Bennett DCJ, disqualifying Mr Hei Hei from driving, be allowed and in lieu thereof the following order issue: "(i) Pursuant to the terms of section 188(2)(d)(ii) of the Road Transport (General) Act 2005, Mr Hei Hei be disqualified from driving for a longer period than 3 years, being for the period concluding 19 February 2014."
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – appeal – aggravating feature – inherent in elements of crime – no lesser sentence warranted – no manifest excess – disqualification from driving – term fixed by judge identical to automatic disqualification period but from future date – power to fix shorter or longer period – original intent given effect – longer period fixed expiring 3 years after conclusion of non-parole period - TRAFFIC LAW – offence – disqualification – method of fixing non-automatic period of disqualification – need to have shorter or longer period – method corrected
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Road Transport (General) Act 2005
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Application by the Attorney General under Section 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act for a Guideline Judgment Concerning the Offence of High Range Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol Under Section 9(4) of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (No 3 of 2002) [2004] NSWCCA 303; (2004) 61 NSWLR 305 Elyard v R [2006] NSWCCA 43 Ex parte Thomas; Re Arnold (1966) 84 WN (Part 1) NSW 493; [1966] 2 NSWR 197 Gardner v R [2003] NSWCCA 199 Kutchera v R [2007] NSWCCA 121 R v Abboud [2005] NSWCCA 251 R v Boulghourgian [2001] NSWCCA 460; (2001) 125 A Crim R 540 CASES CITED : R v Finnie (No 2) [2004] NSWCCA 150 R v McMillan [2005] NSWCCA 28 R v Moore; Ex parte Graham [1977] HCA 20; (1977) 138 CLR 164 R v Presard [2004] 147 A Crim R 385 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Stewart [2005] NSWCCA 290 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate