NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Elias [2009] NSWCA 123
HEARING DATE(S): 28 April 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 May 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Macfarlan JA at 2; Young JA at 31
1. Appeal allowed in part. 2. Set aside the judgment entered in favour of the respondent in the sum of $323,929 and substitute a judgment in a sum calculated in accordance with the reasons for judgment. DECISION: 3. Order the parties within 7 days to bring in short minutes calculating the amount of the judgment to be awarded in favour of the respondent. 4. Order the respondent to pay one half of the appellant's costs of the appeal. 5. The respondent to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951, if qualified.
CATCHWORDS: TORTS - negligence - road accident cases - whether finding that respondent's reporting of symptoms substantially truthful was glaringly improbable - challenge to assessment of damages - past and future economic loss - reassessment by appellate court where primary judge's method of calculating loss not adequately disclosed
LEGISLATION CITED: Suitors' Fund Act 1951
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
CASES CITED: Kallouf v Middis [2008] NSWCA 61 Najdovski v Crnojlovic [2008] NSWCA 175; (2008) 50 MVR 430
PARTIES: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd (Appellant) Roukoz Elias (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40920/07
COUNSEL: K Rewell SC/B Smith (Appellant) D Toomey/T Jones (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Sparke Helmore (Appellant) Stacks Goudkamp (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate