NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Gill v R [2010] NSWCCA 236
HEARING DATE(S): 14 September 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 20 October 2010
JUDGMENT OF: McColl JA at 1; Hulme J at 67; Latham J at 68
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – parity principle – need to preserve parity constituting "special circumstances" for the purposes of s 44, Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Chen, Siregar, Ismunandar & Lau [2002] NSWCCA 174; (2002) 130 A Crim R 300 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 England v R; Phanith v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Josefski v R [2010] NSWCCA 41 OM v R; MH v R; AA v R; AS v R [2009] NSWCCA 267 CASES CITED : Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46; (1984) 154 CLR 606 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Do [2005] NSWCCA 209 R v Rexhaj (New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, 29 February 1996, unreported) R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Wahabzadah [2001] NSWCCA 253 Tatana v R [2006] NSWCCA 398
PARTIES: Mark William Gill (Applicant) The Crown
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/8737
COUNSEL: P Lange (Applicant) D Arnott SC (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate