NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: King v R [2010] NSWCCA 202 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 27 August 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 September 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Hall J at 2; Price J at 3
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - sentencing - whether hardship to mother and children amounted to special circumstances - whether sentence manifestly excessive.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 s 99(2), s 527C,
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 Musgrove v R (2007) 167 A Crim R 424 CASES CITED : R v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 R v Grbin [2004] NSWCCA 220 R v Murphy [2005] NSWCCA 182
PARTIES: Jaime Lee King Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2009/6178
COUNSEL: Mr W Hunt (Applicant) Ms N Noman (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Mr S O'Connor Legal Aid Commission Mr S Kavanagh Solicitor for Public Prosecutions
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2009/6178
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: English DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 20 October 2009
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2009/6178
BASTEN JA HALL J PRICE J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate