NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 201 A Crim R 379
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159
HEARING DATE(S): 7 May 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 30 July 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Johnson J at 9; Rothman J at 107
1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. DECISION: 2. Sentence passed at the Port Macquarie District Court on 17 April 2009 quashed. 3. In place thereof, the Applicant is sentenced to imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of three years commencing 6 March 2008 and expiring on 5 March 2011, with a balance of term of two years commencing 6 March 2011 and expiring on 5 March 2013. 4. The earliest date upon which the Applicant will be eligible for release on parole is 5 March 2011.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence following trial - sexual intercourse without consent - offender aged 16 years 11 months - erroneous regard to standard non-parole period - erroneous description of sentence imposed on offender for earlier sexual assault offence - whether lesser sentence warranted under s.6(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - repeat juvenile sex offender - relevance of intoxication - relevance of youth and immaturity - lesser sentence passed
Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51; (2008) 182 A Crim R 571 TM v R [2008] NSWCCA 158 R v Slade [2005] 2 NZLR 526 R v Elliott [2006] NSWCCA 305; (2006) 68 NSWLR 1 R v Hearne [2001] NSWCCA 37; (2001) 124 A Crim R 451 BP v R; SW v R [2006] NSWCCA 172 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49 MJ v R [2010] NSWCCA 52 McGrath v R [2010] NSWCCA 48 R v Thompson [2005] NSWCCA 340; 156 A Crim R 467 R v Coleman (1990) 47 A Crim R 306 Stanford v R [2007] NSWCCA 73 R v Duncan and Perre [2004] NSWCCA 431 Roper v Simmons 543 US 551 (2005) R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 CASES CITED : Maldonado v R [2009] NSWCCA 189 Baxter v R [2007] NSWCCA 237; 173 A Crim R 284 R v Bus (NSWCCA, 3 November 1995) R v Morgan [2003] NSWCCA 230; 57 NSWLR 533 R v Powell [2000] NSWCCA 108 R v Pitt [2001] NSWCCA 156 Alseedi v R [2009] NSWCCA 185 Ali v R [2010] NSWCCA 35 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381; 167 A Crim R 159 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; 66 NSWLR 566 Veen v The Queen (No. 2) [1988] HCA 14; 164 CLR 465 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343; 55 NSWLR 252 Director of Public Prosecutions v Neethling [2009] VSCA 116; (2009) 22 VR 466 SBF v R [2009] NSWCCA 231 TG v R [2010] NSWCCA 28 R v LNT [2005] NSWCCA 307
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate