NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Attard v James Legal Pty Ltd [No 2] [2009] NSWSC 901 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 25 August 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 2 September 2009
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : Simpson J
DECISION : (i) Statement of claim dismissed. (ii) Verdict and judgment for the cross-claimants against the first and second cross-defendants in the sum of $903,450.00 plus interest in the sum of $534,174.69. (iii) Verdict and judgment for the cross-claimants against the third cross-defendant in the sum of $300,000 plus interest in the sum of $126,196.24. (iv) Verdict and judgment for the cross-claimants against the fourth cross-defendant in the sum of $300,000 plus interest in the sum of $126,196.24. (v) Note that the verdict and judgment amounts in paragraphs 3 and 4 are included in the amount in paragraph 2. (vi) The plaintiffs to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings and cross-claim.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE – judgments and orders – effect of judgments – plaintiffs claim unsuccessful – defendants successful on cross-claim – quantification of moneys owing to defendants – whether plaintiff entitled to invoke assessment of costs regime – whether Court has power under Legal Profession Act to order assessment – in the alternative, whether Court should refer to referee – plaintiffs outside period stipulated by Legal Profession Act for assessment application – reasonableness of claim – verdict and judgment for defendants
LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
CATEGORY : Consequential orders
CASES CITED : Attard v James Legal Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 811
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate