NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: ZHANG & ANOR v MINOX SECURITIES PTY LTD & ORS; LIU & ORS v MINOX SECURITIES PTY LTD & ORS [NO 2] [2009] NSWCA 256
HEARING DATE(S): On the papers.
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 August 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Macfarlan JA at 2; Handley AJA at 3
(1) Vary Order 6 made by this Court on 7 July 2009 by substituting an order that the respondent pay 80% of the costs of the appeal, and 60% of the costs of the relevant proceedings in the Equity Division. DECISION: (2) Motion otherwise dismissed. (3) No order as to the cost of the motion.
CATCHWORDS: COSTS - No question of principle.
LEGISLATION CITED: Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946
CATEGORY: Consequential orders
(1) Ding Yang Zhang and Mei Li - Claimants PARTIES: Minox Securities Pty Ltd (formerly Quantum Securities Pty Ltd) (Administrator Appoined) (ACN 064 185 897) - respondent (2) Jun Liu and Lan Liu - Claimants Minox Securities Pty Ltd (formerly Quantum Securities Pty Ltd) (Administrator Appointed) (ACN 064 185 897) - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA (1) 40234/08; (2) 40235/08
COUNSEL: Mr N Hutley SC and Mr A J Abadee - Appellants Mr McArthur SC and Mr P Rooney - Respondent
Slater & Gordon - Appellants SOLICITORS: Wotton & Kearney - Respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC (1) 1815/07; (2) 1816/07
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Barrett J
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 40234/08 40235/08
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate