NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bydand Holdings Pty Limited v Pineland Property Holdings Pty Limited & Ors [2009] NSWSC 579
HEARING DATE(S) : 19/06/09 JURISDICTION : Equity Division Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 19 June 2009
DECISION : Challenge to statement dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Practice and Procedure - Contempt Proceedings - Undertaking to the Court - Suggested ambiguity - Principled approach
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Morgan (1965) 112 CLR 483 Iberian Trust Ltd v Founders Trust and Investment Ltd [1932] 2 KB 87 Kirkpatrick v Kotis (2004) 61 NSWLR 567 CASES CITED : Microsoft Corporation v Marks (No 1) (1996) 69 FCR 117 Redwing Ltd v Redwing Forest Products Ltd (1947) 177 LT 387 Spokes v Banbury Board of Health (1865) LR 1 Eq 42 Watkins v AJ Wright (Electrical) Ltd [1996] 3 All ER 31
Bydand Holdings Pty Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Pineland Property Holdings (First Defendant) Knight Frank Australia Pty Limited (Second Defendant) Vincent Pang (Third Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50058/08
COUNSEL : Mr LF Kelly SC, Mr P Russell (Plaintiff) Mr C Birch SC, Mr A Cassels (Third Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Barringer Leather Lawyers (Plaintiff) Maxim Legal Pty Limited (Third Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
Einstein J
Friday 19 June 2009 ex tempore Revised 22 June 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate