NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Chen v R [2010] NSWCCA 224
HEARING DATE(S): 8 March 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 October 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Hulme J at 2; Schmidt J at 89
1. Grant leave to appeal against conviction. DECISION: 2. Dismiss the appeal against conviction. 3. Grant leave to appeal against sentence. 4. Dismiss the appeal against sentence.
Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW) Evidence Act 1995
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Azzopardi v R [2001] HCA 25; (2001) 205 CLR 50 B v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 599 Bourke v The Queen (1988) 62 ALJR 425 Dee (1985) 19 A Crim R 224 Healey v R [2006] NSWCCA 235 Kannan v R [2006] NSWCCA 109 Postiglione v R (1996-1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Adler [2002] NSWCCA 180 R v Banic (2004) NSWCCA 322 CASES CITED : R v D (unreported, 26 May 1997) R v Guerin [1967] 1 NSWR 255 R v Huang [2007] NSWCCA 259; (2007) 174 A Crim R 370 R v Meher [2004] NSWCCA 355 R v Ronen [2006] NSWCCA 123 R v Taleb [2006] NSWCCA 119 R v Tsigos (1964-5) NSWR 1607 R v Viana [2008] NSWCCA 118 R v Zorad (1990) 19 NSWLR 91 RPS v The Queen [2000] HCA 3; (2000) 199 CLR 620 Taleb v R [2006] NSWCCA 119
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate