NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Mohammad v Local Court of New South Wales and Sleiman [2008] NSWSC 949
HEARING DATE(S) : 22 May 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 September 2008
JUDGMENT OF : Smart AJ
DECISION : See para 61
CATCHWORDS : Appeal from Local Court after extended hearing - Concreting work at Greenacre - No written contract - No contract of insurance - Non compliance with ss 7, 92 of Home Building Act 1989 - Application of ss 10 and 94 - quantum meruit claim - correct basis of assessing damages - must be principled and not at large
LEGISLATION CITED : Building Services Corporation Act 1969 (now Home Building Act 1989) Local Courts Act 1982
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Balfour Beatty Power Construction Australia Pty Ltd v Kidston Goldmines [1989] 2 Qd R 105 CASES CITED : Brenner v First Artists Management Pty Ltd [1993] 2 VR 221 Fletcher Construction Australia Ltd v Lines Macfarlane & Marshall Pty Ltd [2002] 6 VR Gray (Constructions) Pty Ltd v Hogan 2000 NSWCA 26 Renard Constructions (MT) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234
TEXTS CITED : Mason & Carter Restitution Law in Australia
PARTIES : Tarek Mohammad v Local Court of New South Wales and Eli Sleiman
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12989/07
COUNSEL : E Olsson SC & J E Rowe (P - CD) J Simpkins SC & A Giutarlis (D2 - CC))
Dib Lawyers (P - CD) SOLICITORS : Farah Lawyers (D2 - CC) I V Knight (Local Court - submitting)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Local Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 914/2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate