NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Dee-Tech Pty Limited v Neddam Holdings Pty Limited [2009] NSWSC 1095
HEARING DATE(S) : 12 October 2009 JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12 October 2009
DECISION : Application refused.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - Security for Costs - renewed application on first day of trial - challenge to statement of assets and liabilities before the court on previous application - no explanation for delay in bringing renewed application - plaintiff by and large in the position of the defendant
LEGISLATION CITED : Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1279; (2006) 155 FCR 181 CASES CITED : Estates Property Investment Corporation Ltd v Pooley (1975) 3 ACLR 256 Willey v Synan (1935) 54 CLR 175
Dee-Tech Pty Limited (First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Bright Star Laundry Pty Limited (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) Neddam Holdings Pty Limited (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Rhonda Daily Slattery (Third Cross-Defendant) PARTIES : Bennett Joseph Slattery (Fourth Cross-Defendant) Leon Murray Slattery (Fifth Cross-Defendant) Noela Joyce Streltschenko (Sixth Cross-Defendant) Eugene Streltschenko (Seventh Cross-Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2447/07
COUNSEL : M Tyson (Plaintiff/First to fourth Cross-Defendants) M Moir (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
SOLICITORS : W Lawyers (Plaintiff/First to fourth Cross-Defendants) Cameron & Myers Solicitors (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate