NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Robert Clee v R [2009] NSWCCA 18
HEARING DATE(S): 24 September 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 February 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Hislop J at 2; Harrison J at 56
DECISION: Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – competence of counsel – directions to jury – rule 4.
Crimes Act, 1900 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act, 1912 Criminal Appeal Rules Evidence Act
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Ali v The Queen [2005] HCA 8; (2005) 214 ALR 1 Nudd v The Queen [2006] HCA 9; (2006) 225 ALR 161 CASES CITED : R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Seymour v R [2006] NSWCCA 206; (2006) 162 A Crim R 576 TKWJ v R [2002] HCA 46; (2002) 212 CLR 124
PARTIES: Robert Joseph Clee (Appellant) Regina (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/3200
COUNSEL: In person (Appellant) P Miller (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 05/21/0305
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Knox SC
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 08/06/07
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2007/3200
BEAZLEY JA HISLOP J HARRISON J
17 FEBRUARY 2009 ROBERT CLEE v R Judgment 1 BEAZELY JA: I agree with Hislop J. 2 HISLOP J:
Introduction
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate