NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Roandale Holdings Pty Ltd v Long Nominees Pty Ltd; Rossview Holdings Pty Ltd v Long Nominees Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 945
HEARING DATE(S) : 07/09/09
JUDGMENT DATE : 11 September 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Order that statutory demand be set aside. Order that defendant pay plaintiff's costs.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - statutory demand - application for order setting aside - whether genuine dispute as to existence of debt - not appropriate to address questions of credit upon such application - otherwise no question of principle
Corporations Act 2001, s 459G, 459H(1)(a), 459H(1)(b) LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996, s 127 Payroll Tax Act 2007. clause 18(2), Schedule 2 Workers Compensation Act 1987, s 175B(4)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
CASES CITED : Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 Spacorp Australia Pty Ltd v Myer Stores Ltd [2001] VSCA 89; (2001) 19 ACLC 1270
(1) Roandale Holdings Pty Limited - Plaintiff PARTIES : Long Nominees Pty Limited - Defendant (2) Rossview Holdings Pty Limited - Plaintiff Long Nominees Pty Limited - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC (1) 3778/09; (2) 3779/09
COUNSEL : Mr M W Young - Plaintiff Mr N P Guttentag - Defendant
SOLICITORS : Back Schwartz Vaughan - Plaintiff Guttentag Lawyers - Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate