NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Julian ANDERSON v DPP & 1 Or [2009] NSWSC 1184
HEARING DATE(S) : 15/10/2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 5 November 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Howie J at 1
DECISION : Summons is dismissed. No orders were made as to costs.
CATCHWORDS : Magistrates - Practice and Procedure - committal proceedings - cross-examination of witnesses - whether special reasons exist for witnesses to attend.
Criminal Procedure Act 1986 - ss 91, 93(1) LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes Act 1900 - s 61J(1)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
B v Gould (1993) 67 A Crim R 297 KT v director of Public Prosecutions [2009] NSWSC 1126 CASES CITED : McKirdy v MsCosker [2002] NSWSC 197; 127 A Crim R 217 Steele v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] NSWSC 296; 186 A Crim R 1 Director of Public Prosecutions v O'Conner [2006] NSWSC 458; 181 A Crim R 294 O'Hare v DPP [2000] NSWSC 430
PARTIES : Julian Anderson v Director of Public Prosecutions & 1 Or
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 013834/09
COUNSEL : G Walsh - Plaintiff F Veltro - Defendant
SOLICITORS : G Walsh & Co - Plaintiff S Kavanagh - Defendant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Local Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 737/09
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Magistrate Bradd
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION : 25/06/2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
HOWIE J
THURSDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2009
013834/09 JULIAN ANDERSON v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS AND 1 OR
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate