NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd v Kirkbride & anor [2009] NSWSC 377
HEARING DATE(S) : 6 - 8 April 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 14 May 2009
JURISDICTION : Common Law
JUDGMENT OF : R A Hulme J
DECISION : Judgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants and an order for a warrant of possession of the three properties. Cross claim dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : MORTGAGES - mortgages and charges generally - remedies of the mortgagee - claim for possession of land - CONTRACTS - general contractual principles - discharge, breach and defences to action for breach - Contracts Review Act - whether contract unjust - borrower deferred to husband and signed documents without reading - claimed understanding that mortgage affected investment properties but not family home - whether lender adopted prudent lending practice - LoDoc loan - whether lender imprudent in acting on declarations of borrowers - whether pure asset lending - absence of evidence of contract being entered - inferences to be drawn in absence of witnesses
LEGISLATION CITED : Contracts Review Act 1980 Real Property Act 1900
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Elkofairi v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd [2002] NSWCA 413; (2003) Aust Contract Reports Garcia v National Australia Bank (1998) 194 CLR 395 Kowalczuk v Accom Finance [2008] NSWCA 343 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v Albert and Rose Khoshaba [2006] NSWCA 41 CASES CITED : Riz v Perpetual Trustee Australia Ltd [2007] NSWCS 1153 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd 219 CLR 165; [2004] HCA 52 West v AGC Advances Limited (1986) 5 NSWLR 610 Wilton v Farnworth [1948] HCA 20; (1949) 76 CLR 646 Yerkey v Jones (1939) 63 CLR 649
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate