NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: DOLAN v R [2010] NSWCCA 10
HEARING DATE(S): 3 February 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 11 February 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; Simpson J at 28; RA Hulme J at 29
DECISION: Appeal allowed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - Sentence - Robbery in company - Young offender - Plea of guilty at earliest opportunity following frank admissions to police - Unplanned opportunistic offence - Failure to accord utilitarian value of the plea benefit to offender - Material available for resentence - Assessment of new sentence (by majority)
LEGISLATION CITED: s 97(1) Crimes Act 1900
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Legge v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 244 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 CASES CITED : R v Murchie (1999) 108 A Crim R 482 R v Sundar [2005] NSWCCA 93 R v Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 225 R v Tetereycz [2005] NSWCCA 197 R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
PARTIES: Christopher DOLAN - Applicant REGINA - Respondent/Crown
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2008/5723
COUNSEL: N Steel - Applicant P Leask - Respondent/Crown
SOLICITORS: S O'Connor, Legal Aid Commission - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent/Crown
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2008/5723
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Toner DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 18 November 2008
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 2008/5723
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate