NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Halpin & Ors v Lumley General Insurance Ltd [2009] NSWSC 644
HEARING DATE(S) : 06/07/2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 10 July 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Hoeben J
I direct that the defendant not be required to serve on the plaintiffs the affidavits referred to in the affidavit of Danielle Maree Wallis of 6 July 2009. DECISION : I order that the affidavit of Danielle Maree Wallis of 6 July 2009 and its attachments be placed in a sealed envelope in the Court file and marked "Documents inspected by Court for purposes of Notice of Motion heard on 6 July 2009". I direct that the sealed envelope to which I have referred in (2) above, be retained on the Court file and not be opened without the leave of a Judge. I order that the costs of this motion be costs in the cause.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to waive requirement to serve affidavits - whether the principle in Markus v Provincial Insurance Company Limited (1983) 25 NSWCCR 1 still exists - whether such a principle is consistent with the Civil Procedure Act 2005 and the "cards on the table" approach to litigation - whether elements of Markus principle made out - matters to be taken into account by court in exercise of its discretion.
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth)
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Broadwater Taxation and Investment Services Pty Limited v Hendriks (NSWSC, unreported, 9 September 1993, Santow J) Ingot Capital Investments Pty Limited v Macquarie Equity Capital Markets [2004] NSWSC 40 CASES CITED : Kon v AMP Life Limited [2006] NSWSC 957 Markus v Provincial Insurance Company Limited (1983) 25 NSWCCR 1 Ng v Goldberg (NSWSC, unreported, 17 August 1993, Young J) Nowlan v Marson Transport Pty Limited (2001) 53 NSWLR 116
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate