NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Thomas Sam; R v Manju Sam (No. 14) [2009] NSWSC 561
HEARING DATE(S) : 28 May 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 29 May 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Johnson J at 1
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 29 May 2009
DECISION : Crown permitted to provide lists of references to topics in the record of interview of each Accused to the jury during the Crown closing address.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - jury trial - lengthy records of interview between accused and police - Crown application to provide jury during closing address with documents containing topics and cross-references to answers in interviews - objection by accused to provision of document - relevant discretionary considerations - whether any unfairness to accused - jury entitled to practical assistance - no unfairness to accused - application allowed
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Gately v The Queen [2007] 232 CLR 208 Smith v The Queen (1970) 121 CLR 572 CASES CITED : Butera v Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) [1987] 164 CLR 180 R (Cth) v Petroulias (No. 34) [2007] NSWSC 1462 R v Collins (1986) 44 SASR 214
Regina (Crown) PARTIES : Thomas Sam (Accused) Manju Sam (Accused)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2008/19298; 2008/12927
Mr M Tedeschi QC; Ms G O'Rourke (Crown) COUNSEL : Ms C Davenport SC (Accused/Thomas Sam) Mr T Molomby SC (Accused/Manju Sam)
Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) SOLICITORS : Karp O'Neill (Accused/Thomas Sam) Legal Aid NSW (Accused/Manju Sam)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate