NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Grace v Grace [2010] NSWSC 1527
HEARING DATE(S) : 1 December 2010 JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Brereton J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 1 December 2010
DECISION : Order that the subpoena issued to James Tuite & Associates on 22 November 2010 be set aside.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE – Evidence – Subpoena – Subpoena for production of documents –whether legitimate forensic purpose to obtain further evidence for use on costs argument, which would undermine substantive findings
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Biseja Pty Ltd v NSI Group Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1497 CASES CITED : Guinness Peat Properties Ltd v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership (a firm) (1987) 1 WLR 1027 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Meltend Pty Ltd & Rosenbaum v Restoration Clinics of Australia Pty Ltd & Marzola (1997) 75 FCR 511
David Alexander Grace (plaintiff) Deborah Sharon Grace (first defendant) Julienne Grace (second defendant) PARTIES : Nevilda Holdings Pty Ltd (prov liq'r appted) (third defendant) Nevilda Investments Pty Ltd (prov liq'r appted) (fourth defendant) Dutchie Pty Ltd (sixth defendant) Phoenix Rising Investments Pty Ltd (seventh defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 06/259566
COUNSEL : D Williams SC w S Goodman (plaintiff) A Moses SC w D Stewart (first, second & seventh defendants)
SOLICITORS : James Tuite & Associates (plaintiff) Clinch Long Letherbarrow Pty Ltd (first, second & seventh defendants)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate