NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : NM Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Rimanui Farms Limited [2010] NSWSC 921
HEARING DATE(S) : 17 August 2010
JUDGMENT DATE : 18 August 2010
JUDGMENT OF : Harrison J
DECISION : The report of Mr McDougall dated 2 November 2005 should be admitted into evidence.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – where defendant objected to tender of expert report by plaintiff due to non-compliance with the expert witness code of conduct – where report in largely identical terms to another expert report prepared in collaboration with the first expert – report admissible as the genuine opinion of the expert
LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
ASIC v Rich [2005] NSWSC 149 Cooke v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) [2002] FCA 1315; (2002) 51 ATR 223 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Limited [2001] NSWSC 995 CASES CITED : Investmentsource v Knox St Apartments [2007] NSWSC 1128 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; (2000-2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Paino v Paino [2005] NSWSC 1313 Ray Fitzpatrick Pty Ltd v Minister for Planning [2007] NSWLEC 791
NM Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Rimanui Farms Limited (First Defendant) Gil Gil Farming Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Lloyds Syndicate No 1243 (Third Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2003/93179
J E Maconachie QC with S B Docker and M W E Maconachie COUNSEL : T J Hancock with J P Donohoe and A T Martin (First defendant) B Loukas (Second Defendant) G T W Miller QC with D A Lloyd (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate