NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Cardinal Project Services v Hanave [2010] NSWSC 1367
HEARING DATE(S) : 22 November 2010 and 23 November 2010 JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : McDougall J at 1
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 23 November 2010
DECISION : Determination declared void and quashed. Summons otherwise dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : BUILDING AND ENGINEERING CONTRACTS – adjudication – determinations – validity – where prior adjudication made on same payment claim – where prior determination declared void – whether plaintiff could make second adjudication application – whether second application made within time allowed by s 26(3) – whether second determination void – judicial review – Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) s 26. - STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – meaning of s 26(1)(b) and s 26(3) – giving effect to literal meaning – when time limit for making fresh application runs – considerations of inconvenient consequences – Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) s 26.
LEGISLATION CITED : Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW)
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Brodyn Pty Limited v Davenport (2004) 61 NSWLR 421 Chase Oyster Bar v Hamo Industries [2010] NSWCA 190 CASES CITED : Dualcorp Pty Ltd v Remo Constructions Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 69 Multiplex Constructions Pty Limited v Luikens [2003] NSWSC 1140 Watpac Constructions v Austin Corp [2010] NSWSC 168
Cardinal Project Services Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Hanave Pty Limited (First Defendant) David Campbell-Williams (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate